From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
551 U.S. 877 (2007)
In 1991, Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. (Leegin) (defendant), started selling belts and other women’s accessories under the Brighton brand. The Brighton label was a success, and Leegin eventually provided Brighton products to over 5,000 different retailers across the United States. PSKS, Inc. (PSKS) (plaintiff), operated Kay’s Kloset (Kay’s), a women’s apparel store that began selling Brighton products in 1995. Over the next few years, Brighton products accounted for 40 to 50 percent of the profits earned by Kay’s. In 1997, Leegin began a new policy of not selling Brighton products to retailers that sold below Leegin’s suggested prices. In the announcement for the new policy, Leegin told retailers that Leegin wanted the retailers have sufficient profit margins such that the retailers would be able to focus on customer service and store appearance. In 2002, Leegin learned that Kay’s had been selling the entire line of Brighton products at discount prices. Kay’s refused to stop selling below the prices suggested by Leegin, and Leegin subsequently refused to sell any more Brighton products to Kay’s. PSKS then brought a suit, alleging that Leegin’s resale-price policy violated antitrust law. The court of appeals found the policy to be a per se antitrust violation. Leegin’s appealed, but the court of appeals affirmed. Leegin’s appealed again on the issue of whether the practice was a per se antitrust violation.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.