Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

LEG Investments v. Boxler

California Court of Appeals
107 Cal. Rptr.3d 519 (2010)


Facts

Thomas and Donalee Boxler (defendants) purchased a vacation home at Lake Tahoe with Carl and Judith Bumpass. Each family owned an undivided one-half interest in the property. The Bumpasses sold their interest to Raymond and Sharon Schwerdtfeger. The Boxlers and the Schwerdtfegers entered into a tenancy-in-common agreement that gave each party a right to first refusal before the other party could sell their interest. Subsequently, LEG Investments (LEG) (plaintiff) purchased the Schwerdtfegers’ interest in the property. LEG immediately experienced problems and disputes with the Boxlers. For example, the Boxlers refused to clean the property after use and failed to contribute to landscaping and repair costs. LEG offered either to sell its interest to the Boxlers for $750,000 or to purchase the Boxlers’ interest for the same amount, but the Boxlers declined. In 2005, LEG received an offer to purchase its interest for $1.4 million, pending approval of the Boxlers as co-owners. LEG first offered the Boxlers the right to purchase LEG’s interest, but the Boxlers refused. However, the potential purchaser decided not to approve the Boxlers as co-owners and withdrew the offer. Later, LEG demanded that the Boxlers either offer the property for sale or purchase LEG’s interest. The Boxlers again refused. LEG then sued the Boxlers, seeking a partition by sale. A partition by sale is a court-ordered property sale with the proceeds being divided among the joint owners. LEG alleged that the Boxlers were difficult co-owners, and that the Boxlers made selling LEG’s interest almost impossible. The trial court determined that the inclusion of the right-of-first-refusal provision in the tenancy-in-common agreement waived LEG’s right to a partition by sale and granted summary judgment to the Boxlers. LEG then appealed to the California Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Cantil-Sakauye, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.