From our private database of 31,100+ case briefs...
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
International Court of Justice
2004 I.C.J. 136 (July 9, 2004)
Israel occupied certain parts of Palestine. Israel began building a wall within the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem. The United Nations (UN) General Assembly submitted a request to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for an advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel’s actions under the rules and principles of international law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, and certain UN Security Council and General Assembly resolutions. Additionally, the General Assembly requested the ICJ to rule on the applicability of an international covenant to which a State is a party when the State exercises its jurisdiction outside its own territory.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 557,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 557,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 31,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.