Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

2004 I.C.J. 136 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

International Court of Justice
2004 I.C.J. 136 (2004)

Play video

Facts

The border between Israel and Palestine was a source of ongoing conflict. In 2002, Israel occupied certain parts of Palestine land, meaning that under customary international law, the land constituted occupied territory, and Israel was the occupying power. Israel began building a wall along the West Bank and around East Jerusalem, claiming that it was necessary for protection from Palestinian attacks. The wall was to be located almost entirely in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and there were limitations on Palestinians’ ability to come and go through the wall. Consequently, the wall was enclosing many Palestinians in isolated enclaves, and it would enclose more once completed. The United Nations (UN) General Assembly submitted a request to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for an advisory opinion on the legality of Israel’s actions under international law. When responding to that request, the ICJ addressed its authority to issue advisory opinions and the extraterritorial application of human-rights laws.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (1)

Concurrence (Higgins, J.)

Dissent (Buergenthal, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership