Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
International Court of Justice
2004 I.C.J. 136 (2004)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
The border between Israel and Palestine was a source of ongoing conflict. In 2002, Israel occupied certain parts of Palestine land, meaning that under customary international law, the land constituted occupied territory, and Israel was the occupying power. Israel began building a wall along the West Bank and around East Jerusalem, claiming that it was necessary for protection from Palestinian attacks. The wall was to be located almost entirely in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and there were limitations on Palestinians’ ability to come and go through the wall. Consequently, the wall was enclosing many Palestinians in isolated enclaves, and it would enclose more once completed. The United Nations (UN) General Assembly submitted a request to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for an advisory opinion on the legality of Israel’s actions under international law. When responding to that request, the ICJ addressed its authority to issue advisory opinions and the extraterritorial application of human-rights laws.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (1)
Concurrence (Higgins, J.)
Dissent (Buergenthal, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.