Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
L

Legg v. Chopra

286 F.3d 286 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Legg v. Chopra

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
286 F.3d 286 (2002)

Facts

Legg (plaintiff) filed a medical-malpractice claim against Dr. Chopra and University Urology, P.C. (the doctors) (defendants) in a diversity action in federal district court in Tennessee. To support the claim, Legg sought to introduce the expert testimony of Dr. Bernard Mittemeyer, who was licensed to practice medicine in Texas. In determining Dr. Mittemeyer was not competent to testify, the court relied on a Tennessee statute that required a medical expert to be licensed in Tennessee or a contiguous border state. The court then granted summary judgment in favor of the doctors, holding that Legg had failed to establish that the doctors had not met the standard of care. Legg appealed, arguing that Dr. Mittemeyer’s testimony was admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Suhrheinrich, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Evidence

Key Terms