United States Supreme Court
463 U.S. 248 (1983)
Prior to marrying Richard Robertson (plaintiff), Lorraine Robertson (plaintiff) had a child, Jessica, with Jonathan Lehr (defendant). When Jessica was over two years old, the Robertsons filed a petition for adoption so that Richard could be named as Jessica’s lawful father. Without knowledge of the adoption proceeding, Lehr filed a visitation-and-paternity petition in the family court in a different city. New York had a putative-father registry that Lehr could be listed on by mailing a postcard to the appropriate address. However, Lehr did not to do so. The trial court approved Richard’s adoption of Jessica. Lorraine moved to dismiss Lehr’s paternity action, claiming that the action was moot in light of the adoption order. The family court agreed and dismissed Lehr’s action. Lehr filed a motion to vacate the adoption order on the ground that the order was obtained by fraud and violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The trial court denied Lehr’s motion, holding that Lehr’s commencement of a paternity action did not give Lehr the right to receive notice of the adoption proceeding and that New York’s statutory-notice provisions were constitutional. Lehr appealed. The appellate division and the Court of Appeals of New York affirmed the judgment of the trial court. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.