Leibel v. Raynor Manufacturing Co.
Kentucky Court of Appeals
571 S.W.2d 640 (1978)
- Written by Sarah Larkin, JD
Facts
James Leibel (plaintiff) orally agreed to be the distributor of garage doors manufactured by Raynor Manufacturing Co. (Raynor) (defendant) for the Lexington, Kentucky area on March 1, 1974. Leibel borrowed money to do the tasks necessary to perform under the agreement. The parties did not agree to a specified time when the agreement would end. After two years, Raynor notified Leibel by letter that it was terminating the agreement. The letter stated that termination was effective immediately. Leibel filed suit. Raynor moved for summary judgment, arguing that the agreement was for no fixed duration and could be terminated at will by either party. Leibel argued that he was entitled to reasonable notice before termination. The trial court granted Raynor’s motion, finding that Raynor only needed to provide actual notice. The court reasoned that the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) did not apply to the agreement, but even if it did, Raynor was not obligated to give reasonable notice, only actual notice. Leibel appealed to the Kentucky Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Howerton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.