Leibel v. Raynor Manufacturing Co.

571 S.W.2d 640 (1978)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Leibel v. Raynor Manufacturing Co.

Kentucky Court of Appeals
571 S.W.2d 640 (1978)

Leibel v. Raynor Manufacturing Co.

Facts

James Leibel (plaintiff) orally agreed to be the distributor of garage doors manufactured by Raynor Manufacturing Co. (Raynor) (defendant) for the Lexington, Kentucky area on March 1, 1974. Leibel borrowed money to do the tasks necessary to perform under the agreement. The parties did not agree to a specified time when the agreement would end. After two years, Raynor notified Leibel by letter that it was terminating the agreement. The letter stated that termination was effective immediately. Leibel filed suit. Raynor moved for summary judgment, arguing that the agreement was for no fixed duration and could be terminated at will by either party. Leibel argued that he was entitled to reasonable notice before termination. The trial court granted Raynor’s motion, finding that Raynor only needed to provide actual notice. The court reasoned that the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) did not apply to the agreement, but even if it did, Raynor was not obligated to give reasonable notice, only actual notice. Leibel appealed to the Kentucky Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Howerton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership