Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Leleck v. Triple G Express, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
2002 WL 441337 (2002)


Mark Leleck (plaintiff) was driving when he went off the highway and hit a bridge piling. On May 21, 1999, he filed suit against Triple G Express, Inc. (Triple G) (defendant) claiming that at the time of his accident, one of Triple G’s employees, Curtis Downs, was driving a tractor-trailer that crossed the center lane, causing Leleck to go off the road. Leleck’s complaint alleged that Triple G was vicariously liable for Downs’s actions. Triple G timely responded to Leleck’s complaint with an answer that failed to raise the affirmative defense that Downs was not a Triple G employee. On October 12, 1999, Triple G admitted in its response to Leleck’s interrogatories that Downs was Triple G’s contract employee at the time of the accident. A year and a half later, on June 22, 2001, after the statute of limitations on Leleck’s claim had expired, Triple G attempted to change its responses to the interrogatories and deny an employment relationship with Downs. Triple G filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that Downs was an independent contractor and arguing that without an employer-employee relationship with Downs, it could not be held vicariously liable for his actions in causing the accident. In support, Triple G cited several regulations and cases. Leleck filed his own motion for summary judgment. In response to Leleck’s motion for summary judgment, Triple G confined its arguments to denying an employment relationship with Downs. Both motions are before the court.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Porteous, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 496,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 496,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial