Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Lemoyne-Owen College v. National Labor Relations Board

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
357 F.3d 55 (2004)


Facts

The faculty of Lemoyne-Owen College (LOC) (plaintiff) formed a union. The faculty then petitioned the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (defendant) to recognize the union as the faculty's vehicle for bargaining with LOC management over various matters. LOC opposed the petition on the grounds that the faculty itself was part of LOC's management. In support of its position, LOC cited numerous previous cases in which faculties were denied union recognition, most of which were cases decided by the NLRB itself. Instead of following the precedent set by those cases, the NLRB relied on a few previous cases in which the NLRB had granted union recognition to faculties. The NLRB did not explain why it followed the precedent set by those cases and not the precedent set by the more numerous cases cited by LOC. LOC appealed the NLRB's decision to the United States Circuit Court for the District of Columbia.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 252,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.