Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly
Supreme Court of Michigan
417 Mich. 17, 331 N.W.2d 203 (1982)
Facts
The Messerlys (defendants) purchased a tract of land on which an apartment building was located. Prior to the transfer the owner had installed a septic tank on the property without a permit and in violation of the health code. Later the Messerlys sold the property to the Pickleses (plaintiffs). The contract for sale stated that “Purchaser has examined this property and agrees to accept same in its present condition. There are no other or additional written or oral understandings.” The Pickleses later discovered raw sewage seeping from the land and the Lenawee County Board of Health condemned the property for violation of the health code. The Pickleses alleged failure of consideration and willful concealment and failure to disclose the sanitation condition and asked that the land contract be rescinded. The trial court found there was no fraud or misrepresentation, as none of the parties knew of the transgression of the earlier owner, and the property was purchased “as is” after inspection. The trial court ruled that the Pickleses lacked a cause of action and foreclosure was ordered along with a judgment in the amount of $25, 943. The court of appeals affirmed in part but reversed on the finding of no cause of action. Certiorari was granted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,400 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
