Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
815 F.3d 1145 (2016)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Stephanie Lenz (plaintiff) uploaded a YouTube video of her children dancing to Prince’s “Let’s Go Crazy.” Universal Music Corporation (Universal) (defendant) held responsibility for enforcing Prince’s copyrights and had an assistant in its legal department review YouTube videos for infringing content on a daily basis. The assistant reviewed the video, decided it focused on the Prince song, and Universal issued a takedown notification claiming copyright infringement. Lenz sued Universal under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), arguing that Universal abused the DMCA’s takedown procedures by not first considering whether her video constituted a fair use. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied both motions, reasoning that a triable issue of fact remained as to whether Universal had a subjective good-faith belief that Lenz’s video was lawful, which precluded summary judgment. The court also held that Lenz could proceed under a willful blindness theory by proving only that Universal deliberately ignored whether the video was a fair use, instead of having to show actual knowledge. Both parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tallman, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.