Leonard v. Thornburgh

489 A.2d 1349, 507 Pa. 317 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Leonard v. Thornburgh

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
489 A.2d 1349, 507 Pa. 317 (1985)

DC

Facts

The Philadelphia Non-Resident Wage Tax Cap set the maximum tax rate nonresidents of the city could be assessed on Philadelphia income at 4.3125 percent. Philadelphia Ordinance Number 1716 set the tax rate on wages earned in the city at 4.3125 percent for nonresidents and 4.96 percent for residents. Kathleen Leonard (plaintiff), a city resident and taxpayer, filed a lawsuit against state officials (defendant), alleging that the wage-tax cap for nonresidents and higher tax rate for residents violated the uniformity clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution. The commonwealth court found that the Philadelphia Non-Resident Wage Tax Cap and Ordinance Number 1716 were unconstitutional. State officials subsequently appealed the commonwealth court’s ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaherty, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership