LePage v. Department of Health

18 P.3d 1177 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

LePage v. Department of Health

Wyoming Supreme Court
18 P.3d 1177 (2001)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1995 Susan LePage (plaintiff) submitted to the Wyoming Department of Health (the department) (defendant) a request for a religious exemption so that her daughter could attend public school without receiving a hepatitis B vaccination. In the request, LePage explained that because of religious beliefs, her daughter would not engage in behavior resulting in the exchange of bodily fluids and that, therefore, her daughter did not need to receive the hepatitis B vaccination. The department requested that LePage provide additional information on her religious beliefs. LePage submitted a second letter, in which she repeated the information provided in the first letter. The department then denied LePage’s request for a religious exemption. LePage requested a hearing with the department’s Office of Administrative Hearings. During the hearing, LePage provided no additional information on her specific religious beliefs. The office denied the request, explaining that LePage’s concerns stemmed from her personal, moral, or philosophical beliefs rather than from her religious beliefs. LePage appealed to the Wyoming Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kite, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership