Les Grands Chais de France SAS v. Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco
England and Wales High Court
[2020] EWHC 1633 (2020)

- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Les Grands Chais de France SAS (Grands Chais) (plaintiff) made and sold nonalcoholic sparkling wine under the name Nosecco. Nosecco was made in France, but the bottle displayed Italian phrases. News articles and advertisements online referred to the drink as nonalcoholic Prosecco. Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco (Consorzio) (defendant) was an association established to protect and promote Prosecco, a trademarked term relating to a specific type of Italian wine that was registered as a protected designation of origin, meaning only wines made in a specific region of Italy and meeting other specified criteria could be sold under the name Prosecco. Grands Chais filed for trademark protection, and Consorzio opposed the application, arguing that the mark Nosecco posed a substantial risk of deceiving the public given its similarity to the Prosecco mark. As evidence, Consorzio presented social-media posts in which consumers referred to Nosecco as a nonalcoholic version of Prosecco, with some also complaining about the taste. A hearing officer ruled for Consorzio, finding that the use of the Nosecco mark was contrary to European Union law and likely to deceive the public. Grands Chais appealed in court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nugee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.