Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Lester v. Department of Employment Security

Appellate Court of Illinois
819 N.E.2d 1143 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004)


Facts

Susan Lester (plaintiff) worked as a diverting coordinator for Purity Supermarketing, Inc. (Purity) for over seven years. In May 2001, Lester’s employment was terminated due to financial reasons. Prior to her termination, Lester had been working 35 hours per week at an annual salary of $70,200, and had been receiving benefits and quarterly bonuses. In July 2001, Purity offered Lester a position similar to her old position. The annual salary for the new position was also $70,200, and included comparable benefits and two bonuses per year. The new position required 40 hours of work per week and was located about 30 minutes farther away than Lester’s old office. Although Lester was competent to perform the duties of the new position, she refused the job offer because she was dissatisfied with the salary, workload, longer commute, and number of bonuses. Lester subsequently sought unemployment benefits with the Illinois Department of Employment Security (Department) (defendant). The Department denied Lester benefits based on a finding that she had refused, without good cause, to accept suitable work. The Board of Review and the circuit court affirmed. Lester appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (South, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.