Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Lester v. Sayles

Missouri Supreme Court
850 S.W.2d 858 (1993)


Facts

When Latonya Lester (plaintiff) was four-years old, she was struck by a truck and severely injured while she was crossing a wet street in St. Louis, Missouri. The truck that struck Lester was being driven by Mark Sayles (defendant). Lester sued Sayles for negligence in state court in Missouri, and a jury found for her and awarded damages. On the day of trial, Sayles moved for leave to appeal his answer to allege Lester’s comparative negligence, which the court denied. After judgment, Sayles appealed and alleged reversible error in the trial court’s denial of his motion to amend his answer and its failure to instruct the jury that it could assess Lester’s fault.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Limbaugh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial