Levey v. Warner Brothers Pictures

57 F. Supp. 40 (1944)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Levey v. Warner Brothers Pictures

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
57 F. Supp. 40 (1944)

Facts

In 1898, Ethel Levey (plaintiff), an aspiring actress and singer, met George M. Cohan, a composer and playwright, and they married the next year. Thereafter, Levey played leading roles in plays written and produced by Cohan. In 1907, Levey and Cohan divorced, and Cohan remarried a woman to whom he remained married until his death in 1942. In 1942, Warner Brothers Pictures (defendant), with Cohan’s written consent, exhibited a film entitled Yankee Doodle Dandy (the movie) and related advertisements, which depicted a fictionalized version of Cohan’s life story. The movie shows Cohan’s wife as a character named Mary and never mentions that Cohan was ever divorced. The actress that played the Mary character did not look like Levey, and the actress did not reenact any characters originally played by Levey. Furthermore, Levey’s name was not used in the movie. Nonetheless, Levey filed suit, claiming that the movie was an invasion of her right to privacy in violation of New York law. Levey asserted that the movie depicted her life story in a way that made her clearly identifiable as being portrayed by the Mary character.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bondy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership