Levin v. Commissioner

385 F.2d 521 (1967)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Levin v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
385 F.2d 521 (1967)

Facts

Beatrice Levin (plaintiff) owned 484 shares and served as an officer of a closely held corporation, Connecticut Novelty Corporation, Inc. Levin’s brother and son owned the remaining 485 and 331 shares, respectively. Levin’s son, Jerome, who also owned stock and participated in the management of the business, wished to take over ownership of the corporation from his mother and her brother. Consequently, Levin and her brother each entered into an agreement with the corporation for redemption of their stock. Pursuant to the agreement, Levin would receive $96,800 paid with no interest accruing in installments of $7,000 per year; the corporation had the option to pay off the full amount in advance. Levin retained her position as a director and officer, for which she performed services for the corporation and received a salary. Levin reported the $7,000 payments on her tax returns as long-term capital gains. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed additional taxes on the payments, treating them as constructive dividends taxable as ordinary income. The United States Tax Court ruled in favor of the commissioner. Levin petitioned the Second Circuit for review of that decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership