Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Levin v. Meagher

Court of Appeals for the First District of California
2004 WL 1664864 (2004)


Facts

Todd Meagher (defendant) sold his ownership interest in Credit.com to Adam Levin (plaintiff). Levin paid part of the price with a $331,000 promissory note, secured by a letter of credit. The letter of credit required Meagher to present a draft to Wachovia Bank with a sworn certificate that Levin had defaulted on the note. One of Levin’s obligations was to either pay off and terminate a line of credit guaranteed by Meagher or obtain a release of Meagher no later than April 21, 2003. The line of credit, issued by Wells Fargo, was paid off on April 17th. However, Wells Fargo did not update its computer systems to reflect the payment for several days. A Wells Fargo employee told Meagher that the line of credit was still showing a balance on April 22, 2003. Meagher sent a notice of default to Levin. Levin responded that day with a written statement from the Wells Fargo employee who had received the payment. Meagher presented the letter of credit to Wachovia Bank and sought to draw upon it based on Levin’s default on April 23, 2003. Meagher spoke with a different Wells Fargo employee, who stated the line of credit was still showing a balance and Meagher remained a guarantor until the payment posted to the account. Meagher refused to withdraw his request to draw on the letter of credit, and Levin sued Meagher, seeking an injunction to prevent Meagher from drawing on the letter of credit. The trial court entered a preliminary injunction against Meagher, and Meagher appealed to the Court of Appeals for the First District of California.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Margulies, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.