Levin v. National Basketball Association
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
385 F. Supp. 149 (1974)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Irving Levin and an associate (collectively, the buyers) (plaintiffs) were two businessmen who entered an agreement to buy the Boston Celtics basketball team, which was one of 17 teams in the National Basketball Association (NBA) (defendant). Any transfer of ownership of an NBA team required an affirmative vote of three-quarters of the NBA through each team’s designated governor. Following two separate votes, only two governors voted in favor of approving the buyers’ ownership application, while 13 opposed. Most NBA team owners were seemingly uncomfortable with the buyers’ associations with the current owner of the Seattle SuperSonics, Sam Schulman. The NBA claimed that the business association between the buyers and Schulman was a conflict of interest. The buyers sold their rights in the Celtics and sued the NBA alleging violations of antitrust laws. The NBA filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that its acts had no anticompetitive intent or effect.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Owen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.