Lewis v. Anderson

173 S.W.3d 556 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lewis v. Anderson

Texas Court of Appeals
173 S.W.3d 556 (2005)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Harold Lewis (defendant) and Mindy Anderson (plaintiff) were married in 1974 and divorced in 1977. The parties then cohabitated from 1978 until 1998 and continued to celebrate their wedding anniversary. The parties maintained separate bank accounts. In 1979, the parties joined a church and presented themselves as married. On September 21, 1982, the parties filed a petition to adopt their first child, and both the adoption petition and the subsequent final adoption certificate identified Anderson and Lewis as married. In 1985, the parties adopted their second child, and that adoption decree also listed the parties as married. The parties were presented as a married couple to both children’s schools. In 1998, Anderson filed for divorce and Lewis denied the existence of the marriage, asserting he never agreed to be married again. The trial court found the parties had a common-law marriage as of September 21, 1982. Lewis appealed, arguing that the evidence was factually and legally insufficient to support the jury’s finding.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moseley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership