Lewis v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
531 U.S. 438, 121 S.Ct. 993, 148 L.Ed.2d 931, 2001 AMC 913 (2001)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
James F. Lewis (James) (plaintiff) was injured while working on the M/V Karen Michelle, a vessel owned by Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc. (Lewis & Clark) (defendant). James sued Lewis & Clark in state court for negligence under the Jones Act, unseaworthiness, and maintenance and cure. Lewis & Clark brough a liability-limitation action in federal district court. The federal district court initially issued an injunction against any other suits against Lewis & Clark arising from the incident that injured James. The district court dissolved the injunction, however, after James responded that he was the sole claimant under those events, that he waived any claim of res judicata concerning limited liability, and that his claim amounted to less that the value of the limitation amount. The district court therefore allowed James to proceed with his state-court claim but stayed the limitation action in the event that further proceedings were needed. The court of appeals, however, determined that the district court erred in dissolving the injunction and allowing James’s state claim to proceed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.