Lewis v. National Football League
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
146 F.R.D. 5, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16892 (1992)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Albert Lewis and another professional football player (the players) (plaintiffs) brought an action against the National Football League and its member teams (collectively, NFL) (defendants), purporting to represent a class of football players seeking a determination that the NFL’s first-refusal/compensation system restricted player mobility and violated antitrust laws. The players were represented by law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges (Weil). Weil also represented the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) in a lawsuit against various football players, including 20 proposed-class members, alleging that the players violated their NFLPA licensing agreements by signing licensing contracts with NFL Properties. The players moved for class certification. The NFL argued that Weil’s conflict in both representing and being adverse to the 20 proposed-class members precluded a finding that the lawyers for the proposed class were adequate. Weil indicated that the players were willing to amend their class-certification request to exclude NFL players who had been or might be sued by the NFLPA for breach of contract. Weil noted that the exclusion would not be inequitable because the players’ breaches of their NFLPA agreements had damaged the licensing system that funded litigation challenging player-movement restrictions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lamberth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.