Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Lewis v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.

Supreme Court of Nevada
65 P.3d 245 (2003)


Facts

Leo Gasse bought a used boat manufactured by Sea Ray Boats, Inc. (Sea Ray) (defendant). In addition to the engine, the boat had a small gas generator for air conditioning and other boat features. Gasse and Robin Lewis (plaintiff) slept on the boat, leaving the generator running overnight for air conditioning. The next day, a friend found Gasse dead and Lewis barely alive due to carbon-monoxide fumes that had emanated from the generator overnight. When the boat was initially sold, two warnings were provided about carbon monoxide. The first was written by the manufacturer of the generator, and the other was written by the National Marine Manufacturers’ Association. Both of these warnings focused on the carbon monoxide from the engine exhaust. In addition, when Gasse bought the boat from a Sea Ray dealership, the manager and sales representative warned Gasse about the danger of carbon monoxide. Lewis and the heirs of Gasse (defendants) brought a products-liability suit based on strict liability against Sea Ray. The trial court rejected Lewis’s proposed jury instruction on the adequacy of the warning and instead instructed the jury to use common sense to determine whether the warning was legally sufficient based on the impression that the warning would make on an average consumer of the product. The jury twice asked the judge to define what constituted an adequate warning. In response, the judge simply repeated the prior jury instructions. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Sea Ray. Lewis appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Maupin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.