Liberty Homes v. Epperson
Alabama Supreme Court
581 So. 2d 449 (1991)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Darniece and Fred Epperson (plaintiffs) contracted with a Liberty Homes, Inc. (Liberty) (defendant) dealer for the purchase of a Liberty double-wide mobile home built to the Eppersons’ specifications. The Eppersons financed their purchase. As soon as the Eppersons took delivery of their new home, they became aware of its dangerously faulty electrical system. Over the next three years, the Eppersons worked fruitlessly with Liberty and its dealer to repair the system. Finally, Liberty notified the Eppersons that the home would need to be completely rewired. The Eppersons were forced, at great inconvenience and expense, to move into much smaller quarters until the rewiring was completed. The Eppersons worried that this temporary residence could catch fire, which possibility they took steps to prevent. When the Eppersons’ added expenses prevented them from keeping up with their finance payments, the finance company repossessed their home. The Eppersons sued Liberty. The trial-court jury found that Liberty breached its contract with the Eppersons and awarded them their actual damages and damages for emotional distress. The trial court denied Liberty’s motion for a directed verdict, a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or a new trial, and Liberty appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shores, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

