Lichter v. United States

334 U.S. 742 (1948)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lichter v. United States

United States Supreme Court
334 U.S. 742 (1948)

Facts

In 1942, Congress passed the Renegotiation Act, 56 Stat. 226, 245-46, (the Act) to respond to the increased need for wartime equipment resulting from World War II hostilities. The legislation authorized the government to determine and collect back excessive profits made by private contractors. A number of contractors (plaintiffs) challenged the constitutionality of the Act, arguing that it was an unconstitutional attempt to delegate legislative power to administrative officials. The plaintiffs contended that the policies and standards to be used to make the excessive profit determinations were not sufficiently clear, and therefore, the Act was not a lawful delegation of administrative authority, but was instead an unconstitutional assignment of legislative power. The Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of the Act, and the private contractors appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership