Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Lidow v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

206 Cal.App.4th 351 (2012)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...

Lidow v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

California Court of Appeal

206 Cal.App.4th 351 (2012)

Facts

In 1977, Alexander Lidow (plaintiff) began working for International Rectifier Corporation (IRC) (defendant), a Delaware corporation based in California, and later became a member of IRC’s board of directors (Board) and the chief executive officer (CEO). Lidow did not have a written employment agreement with IRC. In early 2007, IRC began an internal investigation at a subsidiary in Japan after learning of accounting irregularities. The employees of the subsidiary complained about the tactics used by the internal investigators and threatened to resign. Lidow was concerned and traveled to Japan to ease relations with the employees. Lidow expressed his dissatisfaction with the internal investigation and told IRC about the tactics that the investigators used. Lidow further criticized the conduct of the outside law firm hired to oversee the internal investigation. The internal investigation resulted in a report to the IRC’s Board concluding that Lidow was responsible for the accounting irregularities at the subsidiary. In 2007, the Board placed Lidow on paid leave, and Lidow subsequently stepped down as CEO as part of a negotiated separation agreement. Lidow sued IRC, alleging wrongful termination in violation of public policy. IRC moved for summary adjudication, asserting that the internal-affairs doctrine made Delaware law applicable to Lidow’s claim and that, under Delaware law, a CEO was barred from claiming wrongful termination. The superior court granted IRC’s motion for summary adjudication, and Lidow appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boren, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership