From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Life-Link International, Inc. v. Lalla
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
902 F.2d 1493 (1990)
Ozzy Lalla (defendant) sued Life-Link International, Inc. (Life-Link) (plaintiff) in a Colorado state court to collect on a debt. Life-Link counterclaimed, alleging several causes of action under both federal and state law. Four months later, Life-Link sued Ozzy Lalla and Nena Lalla (defendant) in federal court for claims identical to those asserted in Life-Link’s state court counterclaim. Life-Link also asserted that Nena Lalla likely could not be joined in the state-court action for reasons of improper venue. Life-Link then moved to stay the state-court action pending the outcome of the federal suit, and the state court granted the motion. The Lallas moved to dismiss the federal lawsuit, arguing that Life-Link had waived its right to invoke federal jurisdiction because it had filed a state counterclaim instead of removing that action to federal court. The district court agreed, dismissing Life-Link’s action with prejudice, and Life-Link appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled that the district court had erred in dismissing Life-Link’s claim solely on the grounds of waiver. Rather than remanding the case to the district court with instructions to use the appropriate standard in deciding whether to surrender jurisdiction, the court of appeals considered whether a decision by the district court to defer to the state court would be an abuse of discretion in this case. After determining that abstention was not justified in this case, the court considered whether deferral to the state court could be justified for reasons of wise judicial administration.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.