Light v. Chandler Improvement Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
261 P. 969 (1928)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Chandler Improvement Company (Chandler) (plaintiff) offered real property for sale through its agent, a man named Crenshaw. Chandler authorized Crenshaw to show the property and negotiate the terms of purchase with prospective buyers, but Chandler did not authorize Crenshaw to make representations concerning the property’s quality or value. G. P. Light (defendant) purchased the property in reliance on Crenshaw’s representation that the property was suitable for Light’s intended purpose of farming. Chandler loaned Light part of the property’s purchase price, in return for which Light mortgaged the property to Chandler. Over the next several years, Light planted the property with a variety of crops, all of which failed, thereby impoverishing Light. Light informed Chandler that he was unable to make mortgage payments and asked Chandler to rescind the purchase contract. Chandler refused and sued to foreclose on Light’s mortgage. The trial court directed the jury’s verdict for Chandler and entered judgment accordingly. Light appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lockwood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

