From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.
United States Supreme Court
486 U.S. 847 (1988)
Health Services Acquisition Corporation (Health Services) (plaintiff) was a Louisiana company in the business of operating hospitals. Health Services entered negotiations with business promoter John Liljeberg, Jr. (defendant) to purchase the rights to operate a hospital to be built in Kenner, Louisiana. While negotiating the deal with Health Services, Liljeberg was under the impression that he would remain an employee of St. Jude after the rights to operate the hospital were sold to Health Services. Liljeberg sold the business to Health Services, though Health Services correctly noted that there was no written support for Liljeberg’s claim of an agreement for his continued employment. At the same time as he was negotiating the deal with Health Services, Liljeberg was negotiating with Loyola University to build a hospital on land he would purchase from the university. This deal would be separate from the deal with Health Services and Liljeberg would only be able to build one of the hospitals due to a license from the state making the operation of such a hospital possible. Health Services sued Liljeberg in federal court, seeking a declaratory judgment regarding the alleged agreement to employ Liljeberg with St. Jude. The case was heard by Judge Robert Collins, who decided the case without a jury. Judge Collins ruled in Liljeberg’s favor, giving Liljeberg the opportunity to sell the hospital business to Loyola. The decision was upheld by a divided court of appeals. Ten months later, Health Services learned that Judge Collins sat on the Board of Trustees for Loyola University and he was aware that his ruling benefitted the university by allowing it to sell land to Liljeberg, though he only learned of this connection a few days after Judge Collins handed down his decision. Health Services moved to vacate the decision and Judge Collins denied the motion. Health Services appealed and the court of appeals remanded to a different judge on the district court to perform fact-finding regarding Health Service’s claims. The district court again denied Health Service’s motion to vacate. The court of appeals reversed. Liljeberg appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Rehnquist, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.