Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. v. NCR Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
772 F.2d 315 (1985)
- Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD
Facts
NCR Corp. (defendant) planned to build a new headquarters and sought a loan from Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. (Lincoln) (plaintiff) to finance the construction. Lincoln issued a mortgage loan commitment to NCR that set the loan at $14,000,000 at an interest rate of nearly 10 percent. The commitment letter did not require a nonrefundable fee to protect Lincoln if NCR did not borrow Lincoln’s money, although Lincoln received a $50,000 good-faith deposit that was returned to NCR after the parties signed the commitment letter. After the commitment letter was signed, and before the loan was consummated, NCR reconsidered taking Lincoln’s loan because NCR discovered a cash surplus of $200,000,000 and interest rates had declined. NCR notified Lincoln that it wanted to cancel the loan or renegotiate the interest rate. Lincoln responded that NCR had entered into an enforceable contract to take the loan. However, Lincoln used the money it planned to loan to NCR and made other investments. Lincoln then sued NCR for breach of contract and claimed damages of $1,200,000 for lost profits and interest. The District Court for the Northern District of Indiana held that the loan commitment was a contract that NCR breached, but that Lincoln failed to prove damages. NCR appealed the finding that the loan commitment was a contract, and Lincoln appealed the finding that it suffered no damages.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bauer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.