Lincoln Stores v. Grant

34 N.E.2d 704 (1941)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lincoln Stores v. Grant

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
34 N.E.2d 704 (1941)

Facts

Lincoln Stores, Inc. (the company) (plaintiff) operated a store in Norwich, Connecticut. The store was successful but limited by its small selling space. The company’s directors considered exercising an option that would allow the company to lease more space but ultimately decided to let the option expire. Ninety feet away from the company’s Norwich location was a department store run and owned by the Reid & Hughes Company. The department store did not compete with the company’s store, and at no point was it contemplated that it would be in the company’s expectation or interest to acquire the department store. Five years after the company’s decision not to exercise the option to expand its Norwich location, two of the company’s directors, Grant and Martin, and one of its employees, Haley (defendants), learned of an opportunity to purchase stock in the Reid & Hughes department store. Grant, Martin, and Haley charged their expenses related to pursuing the acquisition to the company and eventually purchased the shares in their individual capacities. Grant, Martin, and Haley concealed their acquisition of the department store from the company and used confidential company information to operate the department store in competition with the company’s Norwich location. The company sued Grant, Martin, and Haley, seeking both damages and an injunction that would place their Reid & Hughes shares in a constructive trust for the benefit of the company. A master awarded damages to the company but declined to form the constructive trust. The company appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cox, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership