Lindberg Cadillac Company v. Aron
Court of Appeals of Missouri
371 S.W. 2d 651 (1963)
Leonard Aron (defendant) drove his used Cadillac automobile to a service station for repairs after the coolant in the car froze. A service technician informed Aron that the vehicle’s engine block had two cracks in it and would cost around $500 to repair, which was a significant sum of money. The technician told Aron that, alternatively, the technician could provide a temporary fix to the engine block by placing sealant on the cracks, which would conceal them if Aron planned to trade the vehicle in for a different car. Aron agreed to the temporary fix. Aron traded in his Cadillac for a newer model at Lindberg Cadillac Company (Lindberg) (plaintiff). While inspecting Aron’s vehicle, Lindberg’s sales manager did not discover the two cracks covered by the sealant in the engine block. Aron did not disclose to the sales manager the temporary repairs done to the vehicle’s engine block. The sales manager offered Aron $2,290 for the car. Aron accepted the offer and purchased a new Cadillac. Lindberg spent time and money reconditioning the car that Aron traded in—fixing minor repairs caused by normal use. Lindberg sold the used vehicle to another individual for $2,476. The purchaser subsequently returned the vehicle, because it kept overheating. Lindberg then discovered the cracks in the engine block. Lindberg sued Aron for fraud. The trial court found for Lindberg and awarded $759 in damages. The trial court denied Aron’s motion for a new trial. Aron appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wolfe, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.