From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Lindsay v. National Transportation Safety Board
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
47 F.3d 1209 (1995)
Paul Lindsay (plaintiff) was a licensed pilot with an airline-transportation certificate. After a drunken evening, one of Lindsay’s friends was arrested for flying while drunk. Lindsay had also been in the plane and was highly intoxicated. Lindsay refused to leave his friend’s plane, and law enforcement ultimately left Lindsay to sleep in the plane. An hour or so later, the plane was discovered at a different airport a few miles away. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (defendant) gathered evidence indicating that Lindsay had flown the plane while still intoxicated and issued an emergency order revoking Lindsay’s pilot’s license. Lindsay filed an action with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (defendant), challenging the revocation. Lindsay claimed that one friend had picked him up from the airport and another, sober friend had flown the plane to the other airport. For multiple reasons, the administrative-law judge found that Lindsay’s version of events was not credible and that Lindsay had most likely flown the plane while intoxicated. However, the administrative-law judge ultimately ruled that the FAA had not proved its case against Lindsay because Lindsay’s flimsy story had created some doubt about who had piloted the plane. Accordingly, the administrative-law judge reinstated Lindsay’s license. The FAA appealed the ruling to the NTSB. The NTSB overruled the administrative-law judge, confirmed the revocation of Lindsay’s license, and dismissed Lindsay’s challenge. Lindsay petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, seeking review of the NTSB’s dismissal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Randolph, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.