Linear Technology Corp. v. Micrel, Inc.

275 F.3d 1040, 61 U.S.P.Q.2d 1225 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Linear Technology Corp. v. Micrel, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
275 F.3d 1040, 61 U.S.P.Q.2d 1225 (2001)

Facts

On November 18, 1986, Linear Technology Corp. (LTC) (plaintiff) applied for a patent on an invention involving switching regulator circuitry. The functioning version of the invention was the LT1070 silicon chip. Micrel, Inc. (defendant), a competitor of LTC, later began selling similar chips. LTC brought a patent-infringement suit in federal district court. Micrel contended that LTC had offered the LT1070 for sale more than a year before the patent’s filing date, thus invalidating the patent on the basis of the on-sale bar. The court found that LTC had triggered the on-sale bar by four activities occurring before the critical date: (1) solicitation of pricing information from distributors and sales representatives, (2) publication of preliminary data sheets and promotional information, (3) sales-related communications from LTC to its sales force and from sales representatives to customers, and (4) sales representatives’ requests for LT1070 samples to give to customers. The court also found that LTC had sold the LT1070 when it entered purchase orders from four European distributors into its system before the critical date. However, this was accompanied by communications to the distributors stating that the orders had been received but not booked. There was no testimony as to how the European distributors interpreted these communications. The court ruled in favor of Micrel. LTC appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clevenger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership