Lion Elastomers LLC and U.S. Steelworkers, Local 228
National Labor Relations Board
372 N.L.R.B. No. 83 (2023)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Joseph Colone (plaintiff) filed a complaint at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) against his employer. Colone alleged that his employer engaged in abusive conduct, including threats, discipline, and ultimately termination, all because he was engaged in union activity that was protected under § 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the act). In May 2020, the NLRB found that Colone’s employer had violated § 8 of the act, which prohibited employers from threats, discipline, and discharge in response to protected § 7 conduct. Colone’s employer appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. In July 2020, the NLRB issued a decision in General Motors, LLC that overruled decades of NLRB precedent regarding employee conduct under § 7. Generally, that precedent held that some offensive employee conduct is inevitable in connection with § 7 activities and that such conduct does not take the employee outside the protections of § 7 unless the conduct is egregious. The court of appeals remanded the case to the NLRB for a determination of the impact of General Motors on the instant case. In the interim, President Biden appointed a new Democratic majority to the NLRB.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
Dissent (Kaplan, Member)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.