Lipsitz d.b.a. American Sanitary Wipers Co.

157 N.L.R.B. 1092 (1966)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lipsitz d.b.a. American Sanitary Wipers Co.

National Labor Relations Board
157 N.L.R.B. 1092 (1966)

RW

Facts

The employees of the American Sanitary Wipers Company, which was controlled by Mr. and Mrs. Lipsitz (the employers) (defendants), elected a union (plaintiff) to represent them in negotiating a new labor contract. When negotiations broke down over money issues, the union filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The complaint charged that the employers violated § 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which requires labor and management representatives engaged in collective bargaining to show each other good faith. An administrative law judge (ALJ) found that although the employers were willing to go on negotiating with the union, and observed all the formalities of collective bargaining, they stubbornly refused to give ground on any money issue that could even minimally increase the company’s operating costs. The ALJ recommended that a three-judge NLRB panel find the employers in breach of § 8(a)(5).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fanning and Zagoria, members)

Dissent (Brown, member)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership