Liristis v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Arizona
204 Ariz. 140 (2002)
- Written by Genan Zilkha, JD
Facts
Carla Liristis and other insureds (plaintiffs) owned and resided in a home covered by an insurance policy through American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family) (defendant). The policy contained an exclusion for mold. In August 1996, there was a fire in the plaintiffs’ home. The house suffered fire damage and water damage as a result. The plaintiffs filed a claim, and American Family paid the plaintiffs $31,370.99. When the plaintiffs moved back into their home, they noticed mold and suffered allergic reactions and unexplained illness. After the fire, the roof of the house leaked every time it rained. The plaintiffs hired a contractor to fix the leaks. The plaintiffs notified American Family of the continued leaks in 1996 when they filed a claim for water damage. The plaintiffs hired an expert to conduct an environmental assessment of the house. The expert found dangerous mold-producing bacteria present in the home. American Family also had an environmental assessment performed, the results of which also showed dangerous bacteria present in the home. The plaintiffs made a claim for the environmental damage to the home resulting from the water damage. American Family denied the claim based on the mold exclusion. The plaintiffs sued American Family, alleging breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair insurance trade practices. The plaintiffs and American Family each moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of American Family. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gemmill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.