Little River Bank & Trust Co. v. Peskin (In re Estate of Rosenthal)
Florida District Court of Appeal
189 So. 2d 507 (1966)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Barbara Rosenthal, decedent, placed the residuary of her estate in a testamentary trust under which Martha Peskin (defendant) was one of the remaindermen. Little River Bank & Trust, Co. (plaintiff) was the executor of Rosenthal’s estate. In connection with the administration of the estate, the bank hired an attorney to handle the sale of a residence owned by the estate. After the closing, the net proceeds from the sale were deposited in the attorney’s trust account. That same day, the bank made several efforts to recover the proceeds. However, due to embezzlement by the attorney, the bank was only able to recover a portion of the net proceeds. The attorney was promptly fired by the executor and died shortly thereafter. Peskin petitioned to have the bank reimburse the estate for the lost proceeds, arguing that the bank improperly delegated the real estate sale to the attorney and should therefore be responsible for the actions of its chosen agent. The bank countered, arguing that it was not liable for the lost proceeds because the delegation to the attorney was neither negligent nor improper. The trial court ordered the bank to reimburse the estate for the embezzled funds. The bank appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hendry, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.