Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. v. Nationwide Power Corp.

106 F.3d 366 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. v. Nationwide Power Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
106 F.3d 366 (1997)

Facts

In April of 1986, Nationwide Power Corporation (Nationwide) gave Highlander International Corporation (Highlander) a security interest in certain cash collateral to secure a debt. The cash collateral covered a cause of action that Nationwide had against Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. (Litton) (plaintiff). However, Highlander did not file a financing statement to perfect its interest until August of 1989. On June 9, 1986, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assessed tax penalties exceeding $700,000 against Nationwide. On July 3, 1986, the IRS properly filed a notice of federal tax lien. In August of 1989, Nationwide obtained a judgment against Litton. Litton initiated an interpleader action for the court to determine whether Highlander or the United States (the Government) (defendants) is entitled to the $572,627.46 that Litton deposited with the court, which represented the funds Litton owed to Highlander pursuant to the judgment. The district court held that the Government’s federal tax lien had priority over Highlander’s unperfected security interest because Highlander’s interest was not protected under Florida law against a judgment lien.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Birch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership