United States Circuit Court for the District of Virginia
15 F.Cas. 660 No. 8411 (1811)
As president of the United States, Thomas Jefferson (defendant), a citizen of the State of Virginia, broke and entered into Edward Livingston’s (plaintiff) dwelling-house in the City of New Orleans. Jefferson took various tools from the dwelling-house, and used them to dig, raise, and carry away the soil of a parcel of Livingston’s land for his own use. As a result, the parcel of land was destroyed. Livingston brought this action against Jefferson for trespass in the United States Circuit Court for the District of Virginia. Jefferson challenged the jurisdiction of the court because the dwelling-house and parcel of land that he allegedly trespassed were not within the Virginia district. Livingston maintained that the court had jurisdiction because Jefferson was a citizen of the State of Virginia.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.