LJ by NNJ v. School Board of Broward County

927 F.3d 1203 (2019)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

LJ by NNJ v. School Board of Broward County

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
927 F.3d 1203 (2019)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

LJ (plaintiff), a child with autism and a speech impediment, was a student in the Broward County school system from kindergarten until seventh grade. In third grade, school officials worked with LJ’s mother to create and implement an individualized education program (IEP) for LJ as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). In sixth grade, LJ exhibited severe behavioral issues, and the School Board of Broward County (board) (defendant) proposed a new IEP to accommodate the middle school transition. LJ’s mother filed an IDEA complaint to challenge the content of the proposed IEP and invoked the IDEA’s stay-put provision to reinstate the elementary school IEP until her challenges were resolved. LJ’s mother filed numerous additional complaints regarding the new IEP’s content. An administrative-law judge (ALJ) eventually ruled that the new IEP’s content was appropriate and that the board had adequately implemented the elementary school IEP during the administrative proceedings. LJ’s mother appealed the decision to a district court, which affirmed it. During the time between the ALJ’s decision and the district court’s affirmation, LJ continued to exhibit behavioral issues, and LJ’s mother filed another complaint alleging that the board failed to implement the elementary school IEP during the federal court proceedings. An ALJ found that the board had failed to implement significant provisions of the IEP during the court period, and both parties filed claims in district court, LJ’s mother seeking enforcement of the ALJ’s order and additional relief and the board challenging the order. The district court reversed the ALJ’s decision, and LJ’s mother appealed to the Eleventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Grant, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Jordan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership