Lloydona Peters Enterprises, Inc. v. Dorius

658 P.2d 1209 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lloydona Peters Enterprises, Inc. v. Dorius

Utah Supreme Court
658 P.2d 1209 (1983)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

Lloydona Peters Enterprises, Inc. (Lloydona) (plaintiff) was owned by four sisters in equal shares. Each sister served as a director and an officer. One of the sisters, DeLoris Dorius, and her husband (collectively, the Doriuses) (defendants) purchased an office building for which Lloydona agreed to pay half in exchange for a one-half interest in the property. Several years later, Lloydona and the Doriuses discussed the possibility of Lloydona selling its share in the property to the Doriuses. The directors agreed to get the property appraised. All four directors viewed the appraisal as valid, and the Doriuses gave a check for the appraised-value amount to Gay Driggs, director and treasurer of Lloydona. Jean Hull, director and president of Lloydona, and another director were undecided whether to sell Lloydona’s interest at the appraised price, but Driggs deposited the check in Lloydona’s bank account contrary to Hull’s and the other director’s express wishes. Subsequently, the Doriuses no longer recognized Lloydona’s interest in the property and discontinued forwarding Lloydona’s share of rental payments from the property. On behalf of Lloydona, Hull initiated an action in trial court against the Doriuses to convey to Lloydona a one-half interest in the property. The Doriuses filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that Hull had no authority to initiate litigation on behalf of Lloydona. The trial court granted the motion, and Lloydona appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hall, C.J.)

Dissent (Durham, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership