Local 12, United Rubber Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
368 F.2d 12 (1966)
- Written by Kelsey Libby, JD
Facts
Starting in 1943, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 12 (Local 12) (plaintiff) was the exclusive bargaining agent for employees at Goodyear’s tire plant in East Gadsden, Alabama. The bargaining contract provided for uniform seniority rights regardless of race. However, in 1961, eight Black employees (the complainants) complained to Local 12 after being laid off while certain White employees with less seniority had been retained or hired, and because the plant had been maintaining segregated facilities like lunchrooms and bathrooms. The union grievance committee investigated and determined that no contract violation had occurred, and, after a series of appeals, Local 12 declined to file a grievance on behalf of the complainants. Meanwhile, in March 1962, Local 12 and Goodyear reached a verbal agreement to discontinue the racially discriminatory layoff and recall practices, and the complainants were reinstated. However, Local 12 refused to process grievances regarding back wages during the layoff period and the segregated facilities. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (defendant) determined that Local 12 committed unfair labor practices by refusing to process the grievances and ordered Local 12 to pursue the grievances through arbitration. Local 12 appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thornberry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.