Local Joint Executive Board of Hotel and Restaurant Employees (Crown Cafeteria)
National Labor Relations Board
135 N.L.R.B. 1183 (1962)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
The hotel and restaurant employees’ union (the union) (defendant) picketed Crown Cafeteria (Crown) after Crown refused to hire employees through the union and did not sign a standard contract with the union. The union’s signs were addressed to “members of organized labor and friends” and stated that Crown was a nonunion employer. The union picketed without filing a grievance petition for longer than the 30-day period provided by § 8(b)(7)(C) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), but the picketing did not induce any stoppages of goods or services. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concluded that the union’s picketing violated § 8(b)(7)(C) and found that the picketing was not protected under the so-called publicity proviso, which protected union picketing done for publicity purposes (i.e., to advise the public about the lack of a union contract or union organization). The NLRB’s majority reasoned that the publicity proviso applied only when the union’s sole objective was to disseminate information, with no present goal of employer recognition. The majority concluded that because the union was demanding present recognition from Crown, the publicity proviso did not apply. Two members dissented, asserting that the publicity proviso protected even picketing that sought recognition or organization as long as the picketing met two conditions: (1) the picketing had to truthfully advise the public that the employer did not employ union members or have a contract with the union; and (2) the picketing could not induce any individual employed by any other person not to pick up, deliver, or transport any goods or not to perform any services. The union filed a motion for reconsideration of the NLRB’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.