Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving Drivers v. Crowley

467 U.S. 526 (1984)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving Drivers v. Crowley

United States Supreme Court
467 U.S. 526 (1984)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

There was a pending officer election set to occur in December 1980 for Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving Drivers (the union) (defendant). Before the election, several union members were excluded from a union meeting to nominate candidates because the union members could not produce a computerized receipt showing their dues payment. In addition, although challenger John Lynch claimed to have been nominated for the position of secretary-treasurer, ballots distributed to union members named Lynch as a nominee for the position of president. Based on these events, Jerome Crowley and other challenging union members (plaintiffs) sued the union in district court, alleging violations of their rights protected under Title I of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) as follows: (1) violation of equal rights to nominate candidates and attend union meetings and (2) violation of their freedom of expression at union meetings. The district court ordered the distributed and mostly completed ballots to be sealed and delivered to court, preventing a ballot count. Invoking Title I jurisdiction, the court further invalidated the ballots and selected an outside arbitrator to conduct a new election. On appeal, the secretary of labor intervened on the union’s behalf. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s injunction. The matter came before the Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership