Lochner v. New York

198 U.S. 45, 25 S. Ct. 539, 49 L. Ed. 937 (1905)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lochner v. New York

United States Supreme Court
198 U.S. 45, 25 S. Ct. 539, 49 L. Ed. 937 (1905)

Play video

Facts

In 1896, the New York legislature enacted the Bakershop Act, which limited the hours bakers were permitted to work to no more than 10 per day. Joseph Lochner (defendant) owned a bakery in New York (plaintiff) and was fined twice under the law for overworking an employee. His conviction was upheld in the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court and was affirmed in the New York Court of Appeals. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Peckham, J.)

Dissent (Holmes, J.)

Dissent (Harlan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.