Loewen Group v. United States of America
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
Award in ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3 (NAFTA) of 26 June 2003 (2003)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Jeremiah O’Keefe, Jerry O’Keefe, and the businesses owned by the O’Keefe (collectively, O’Keefe) family sued Loewen Group, Inc. (Loewen) (plaintiff), a Canadian corporation, in Mississippi state court. O’Keefe initiated the suit after a dispute involving three contracts between O’Keefe and Loewen and a dispute involving an exchange of two O’Keefe funeral homes for a Loewen insurance company. Throughout the trial, O’Keefe’s lawyer portrayed his client as a proud Mississippian and small businessman victimized by a “ruthless foreign (Canadian) corporate predator.” Over the objections of Loewen’s attorneys, the trial judge refused to give an instruction stating that nationality-based, racial, or class-based discrimination was impermissible in the jury deliberations. The jury awarded O’Keefe $500 million in damages. Loewen then brought a claim to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes against the United States of America (defendant), claiming the conduct of the Mississippi trial court constituted a violation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Loewen argued that the trial judge impermissibly allowed O’Keefe’s attorneys to make race-based and class-based distinctions between O’Keefe and Loewen, resulting in a grossly excessive verdict. Loewen also argued the trial judge repeatedly allowed the lawyers for O’Keefe to make irrelevant and prejudicial references to Loewen’s status as a Canadian company over the objections of Loewen’s attorneys. The United States responded, arguing that the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes lacked the jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter. The United States further argued that the trial judge’s behavior did not constitute a violation under NAFTA as Loewen was treated no differently than any American defendant.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.