Logan v. Commissioner

51 T.C. 482 (1968)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Logan v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
51 T.C. 482 (1968)

Facts

Frank A. Logan (plaintiff) and Thomas S. Dawson formed the law partnership of Logan & Dawson (the partnership). Under the partnership, Logan performed legal work on a contingent-fee basis. When Logan decided to retire, Dawson agreed to buy Logan’s partnership interest and assume all liabilities of the partnership. At the time of the sale, the partnership had work in progress that had not been billed to clients and was not being performed pursuant to any expressed agreements or written contracts. Pursuant to the buyout agreement, Dawson paid Logan for unbilled fees due to the partnership for the work in progress. Logan argued that the unbilled fees were not unrealized receivables within the meaning of § 751 of the Internal Revenue Code and therefore that the payment Logan had received for the unbilled fees was taxable as capital gains rather than as ordinary income. Section 751 provides that unrealized receivables are a partnership’s rights, contractually or otherwise, to be paid for services rendered or to be rendered by the partnership.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tannenwald, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership