Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County, Florida

148 F.3d 1231 (1998)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County, Florida

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
148 F.3d 1231 (1998)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Two varieties of sea turtles were endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). In the spring, the turtles would lay their eggs in the sand of a 40-mile stretch of beach in Volusia County, Florida (the county) (defendant). Later, guided by moonlight, the sea-turtle hatchlings would endeavor to reach the ocean, but artificial-light sources would disorient or misorient them. The county allowed nighttime beach driving and beachfront artificial-light sources. Several citizens and turtle species (citizens) (plaintiffs) sued the county under the ESA, primarily seeking injunctive relief to stop beach driving and beachfront artificial-light sources that adversely impacted sea turtles. While the lawsuit was pending, the county obtained an incidental-take permit (ITP) from the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) that authorized 11 types of incidental takes of sea turtles relating to beach driving but only mentioned beachfront lighting in the context of mitigation measures to reduce the impact to sea turtles from vehicles and vehicle headlights. The county argued that the mention of beachfront lighting in the ITP as a mitigation measure was intended to exempt that activity from the ESA’s prohibition on taking. The district court agreed and dismissed the citizens’ suit. The citizens appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hatchett, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership