London Leasing Corporation v. Interfina, Inc.
Supreme Court of New York
279 N.Y.S.2d 209 (1967)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Interfina, Inc. (Interfina) (defendant) made and delivered a promissory note for $52,000 to London Leasing Corporation (London Leasing) (plaintiff). The note was signed by Frederick Evans (defendant), as Interfina’s president. The note was also personally endorsed by Evans. The note was not paid. Through Evans in his capacity as president, Interfina entered into agreements with London Leasing to extend the time for payment. Interfina failed to pay the note in full. London Leasing sued Interfina and Evans to collect on the note. At trial, London Leasing moved for summary judgment for the unpaid amount on the note. Evans argued that the extension agreements discharged Evans from personal liability on the note, because he did not personally consent to the extension, but rather signed the agreements solely in his corporate capacity as Interfina’s president.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Crawford, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
